Sitchin is Right – Reason #1

sitchin_2As someone working on a series of books partly based on the writings of Zecharia Sitchin, I’ve given a lot of thought to the ongoing debate about his work. Having been exposed to his work for many years, I’ve drawn my own conclusions about what I think he got right and what I think he may have gotten wrong.

The mainstream paints “Sitchinites” as a kind of new-age religious cult believing in space alien gods and a planet that will come crashing into Earth one day soon. Those strains are out there, for sure, but most of the people I know who study Sitchin’s work are some of the most well-read people I know. They don’t base their paradigms completely on him. They simply see him as the clearest explanation that pulls the paradigm together.

So, in response to Dr. Michael S. Heiser’s well-known website called Sitchin is Wrong, I’m going to write a series of blogs to explore why I believe Sitchin right.

Reason #1. Sitchin is an honest journalist. He may not have been the most skilled near-eastern linguist on the planet and we’ll deal with that assertion in a future blog post. However, he takes the Sumerians as eye-witnesses to the events in their world.

I don’t know about you, but TV analysis drives me a little nuts. You watch an event or listen to a speaker and then they bring on a team of experts to explain to you what you just saw or heard. The assumption is you’re not smart or “trained” enough to analyze it yourself. You need their help.

Many academic fields, including archaeology, work the same way. Strike one against Sitchin, or against you, is you lack the training to properly assess the Sumerian texts and all the sub-meanings you should attribute to them. Because just like a news network, they need you to see the information terms of the proper theory – theirs.

Here are just a few of the many examples.

  • Sitchin says that the Sumerians claim their gods came from the sky (maybe space is a modern interpretation), but for sure from the sky. The Sumerians are one of many ancient cultures who make this same claim.
    • Experts (aka the analysts) say, “Well, yes, it may say that, but we know that can’t be true. The impossibility of faster-than-light travel means that no such beings could reach Earth. Besides, we see no evidence of that today, so it can’t be true.” They dismiss what the eyewitnesses say and fill it in with what they know to be true. Sitchin just reports what the texts say.
  • Sitchin says that the Sumerians claim their gods lived among them and ruled them.
    • Experts (aka the analysts) say, “Yes, the texts say that, but we know that must be myth and metaphor. We already ruled out the gods’ reality or ability to get to Earth.
  • Sitchin says that the Sumerians claim their gods gave them the knowledge on which they built their civilization, by everyone’s agreement, quickly and from nothing.
    • Experts (aka the analysts) say, “Well, we’re not sure how they emerged so quickly, but we know these imaginary gods could not have helped them.” The newest line of argument includes, “You’re denying human achievement and thinking little of our ancestors by suggesting they needed the help.” (emotional argument)

These are just three examples. I could cite many, many more. The theme is always the same. Sitchin takes the Sumerian reports at face value and reports what they say happened. The experts repeatedly take the approach of, “Yeah, yeah we know what the texts say, but here’s what we know really happened.”

Sitchin gives the Sumerians credit for being able to tell us what was going on around them. Just like we would believe the eyewitness to an accident before we’d believe an accident expert who wasn’t there.

The experts are generally dismissive. They claim we’re dealing with illiterate, unscientific people who made up all these stories to make sense of their world.

Who do you believe? The Sumerians or today’s experts?

That’s Reason #1 Sitchin is Right.

Stay in your truth!

Ray

Ray’s new speculative fiction novel is turning heads.

“My mind is officially blown,” wrote one reviewer. “After Chapter 10, I couldn’t put it down,” said another.

anunnaki_cover_full_colorRay’s speculative fiction novel, Anunnaki Awakening: Revelation, is turning heads. Where did humanity really come from and where is it going? This is Book 1 of a trilogy. The Awakening has begun!

Learn more about the trilogy and order your signed copy today at AATrilogy.com.

About Ray Davis

Ray Davis is the author of the Anunnaki Awakening trilogy - speculative fiction series focusing the issues of humanity's past and future. The series is heavily influenced by the science fiction genre. Book 1 - Revelation - is now available - http://www.AATrilogy.com. Ray has written prolifically on the topics of personal development and human potential. In 2007, Ray founded The Affirmation Spot - a website offering downloadable mp3 motivational tools and affirmations. http://www.theaffirmationspot.com. Ray began studying affirmations and positive thinking after a life-threatening illness at 25. His thirst for self-improvement led him to read the writings of Joseph Campbell, Wayne Dyer, Deepak Chopra, Neale Donald Walsch, and many other luminaries in the fields of mythology and motivation. Over time, he has melded these ideas into his own philosophy on self-development. He has written and used affirmations and other tools throughout that time to improve his own life and has a passion for helping other reach for their goals and dreams. In 2010 he authored an eBook titled The Power to Be You: 417 Original Daily Thoughts for Personal Empowerment. Ray holds a Bachelor's of Science Degree in Secondary Education in Social Studies from University of Kansas. He lives in Louisburg, KS with his wife, April, two grown stepkids, and his black lab, Mia.
This entry was posted in History, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Sitchin is Right – Reason #1

  1. Aethyrius says:

    I enjoy your candor and appreciate your use of deductive reasoning, rather than reductive. It is astounding how stubborn the archaeological establishment can be when it comes to making assumptions about whether or not the ancients were competent enough to make accurate statements of what they actually experienced.

    • Ray Davis says:

      Sorry. I’d missed your comment. Thank you for the kind words. It is frustrating. It impacts how we all see ourselves and the world. It’s important we consider the options.

  2. Pingback: Another Reason Sitchin is Wrong is Wrong | Ray A. Davis

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s