Sitchin is Wrong…is Wrong


Dr. Michael S. Heiser made it part of his mission towards the end of Zecharia Sitchin’s life to challenge his linguistic scholarship. In a 2001 open letter, he famously challenged Sitchin (and his followers) to a debate on several specific questions related to Sitchin’s translations of the Sumerian texts.

Heiser even convinced George Noory to arrange for the two to debate on Coast to Coast A.M. Heiser has made a lot of hay over the years that Sitchin never responded to him and implied that this demonstrated Sitchin’s lack of credibility. Later Dr. Heiser founded his website It became a lightening rod and short-hand refutation of Sitchin for academics and religious adherents alike.

Heiser’s claim has been that he offers an unbiased “academic” criticism of Sitchin’s scholarship. He claims to disprove Sitchin’s translations point-by-point. For the purposes of this article, we’ll leave that aside except to say, as I point out in a previous article, they read the text from different perspectives. Sitchin reads the texts from the perspective of a modern thinker taking the Sumerians as eyewitnesses to their events. Heiser, following the mainstream line, dismisses the texts as myth and allegory. This, not linguistics, accounts for most of the differences in their interpretations.

Let’s go back to today’s point. Heiser claims to offer an academic alternative to Sitchin. Yet, he has often engaged in attacks based on logical fallacy. Case in point is his December 20, 2008 blog post: Is Zecharia Sitchin Anti-Semitic? In it, Heiser engages in the most transparent of Ad Hominem/Guilt by Association arguments. I will demonstrate how this is a classic logical fallacy in a moment. First, let’s acknowledge that the number one weapon Sitchin critics seek to employ is to discredit him before someone even considers his side of the debate. An article with this title and this accusation clearly warns Jewish and many Christian seekers this is information you can discount because it’s anti-semitic. This phrase is one of the top discussion closers in our culture. The mere assertion is the end of the discussion for many people.

This logical fallacy is meant to assault the character of the speaker (in this case Sitchin) by associating him  and his ideas with something or someone negative (in this case an early 20th Century German Assyriologist Friedrich Delitzsch). Delitzsch was famous for his “Babel and Bible” lecture in the early 1900s. His writings are generally deemed to be anti-semtic and he was an early proponent of German Aryanism that sought to supplant Biblical stories with German myths. Many see this line of thought as a precursor to Hitler.

The specific implied charge? Delitzsch proposed what he called PanBabylonianism. This was the idea that the Book of Genesis and other Semitic writings were originally sourced from Mesopotamian precursors and were not original works of the Semites (for example the Israelites). This, of course, is also an argument Sitchin, me, and many other people who have studied this issue agree with. It’s relatively easy to prove the linkage through the first historic personage in the Bible – Abrahm – back to his Mesopotamian roots in Ur. It’s plain text in Genesis. The pre-Abrahamic parts of Genesis bear many similarities to Genesis and it’s not a huge leap of logic to conclude these stories came from there.

Follow the logic here. First, and this charge is unspoken, claiming the Book of Genesis is sourced from elsewhere is anti-semitic because it seeks to steal a key semitic contribution to history. Never mind that there’s a lot of evidence that this sourcing is true. Secondly, if Sitchin (or you) believe the same thing Delitzsch believes and he is was an anti-semite, then Sitchin and you must be anti-semitic too. That’s the logical fallacy and non-academic argument being made here.

Heiser opens the article with the classic cover someone about to engage in this logical fallacy employes. “I’m not saying A, but…” He answers the title of his article with, “I don’t believe so (Sitchin is Jewish).” This opens the door for him to deny the attack, while simultaneously attacking.

It seems odd to me that a scholar claiming to hold the academic high ground and the evidence in a debate would need to resort to this kind of attack on Sitchin and all of us who support his work and/or have studied these things ourselves.

I’m not anti-semitic, are you? I don’t think pursuing the truth where it leads, based on evidence, makes one anti-semitic. If the evidence says that the pre-Abrahamic accounts in Genesis were drawn from the earlier culture that Abrahm himself came from, I don’t think that makes one an Aryan.

While I appreciate Dr. Heiser warning me about straying into this delicate area, this article doesn’t make me question Sitchin’s scholarship or motives, but rather Heiser’s.

Be free! Be inspired! Follow your bliss!


Ray Davis is the author of Anunnaki Awakening: Revelation – order your signed copy today at – founder of The Affirmation Spot and an advocate for the potential of the human race.

anunnaki_cover_full_colorAnunnaki Awakening: Revelation is turning heads and opening minds. Humanity’s past is checkered, secret, and dangerous.

White House Correspondent Maria Love is on to the story of her life and with the help of an Anunnaki leaders seeks to unravel and reveal history’s biggest conspiracy. The Awakening has begun!

About Ray Davis - The Affirmation Spot

I am the Founder of The Affirmation Spot, author of Annuanki Awakening, and co-founder of 6 Sense Media. My latest books are the Anunnaki Awakening: Revelation (Book 1 of a trilogy) and The Power to Be You: 417 Daily Thoughts and Affirmations for Empowerment. I have written prolifically on the topics of personal development and human potential for many years. By day, I write sales training for Fortune 100 company. I began studying affirmations and positive thinking after a life-threatening illness at 25. My thirst for self-improvement led him to read the writings of Joseph Campbell, Wayne Dyer, Deepak Chopra, Neale Donald Walsch, and many other luminaries in the fields of mythology and motivation. Over time, I have melded these ideas into my own philosophy on self-development. I have written, recorded, and used affirmations and other tools throughout that time to improve my own life and I have a passion for helping other reach for their goals and dreams. Ray holds a Bachelor's of Science Degree in Secondary Education in Social Studies from University of Kansas. He lives in Spring Hill, Ks with his wife.
This entry was posted in Anunnaki, Sumerian texts, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Sitchin is Wrong…is Wrong

  1. Don says:

    I talked to Sitchin years ago and he wouldn’t refer me to one text said buy my books I said I didand read the first couple. Show me Zack ran off wouldn’t answer my emails any more?? Didn’t look good. So if he csnt show me can you?

    • Ray Davis says:

      Fascinating that you met him. Graham Hancock tells a similar story. I don’t place my reliance on Sitchin’s translations. I wrote this to defend him against unfair attacks launched at him in his extreme old age and after his passing. I’ve spent 30 years studying mythology, history, and information about the past that don’t fit our present paradigm. This information is cavalierly dismissed by mainstream thinking. I’ll take anyone’s translation and show where culture after culture says certain things happened that we dismiss today. We’re told they were unsophisticated people creating stories to explain a world they didn’t understand…that is until we nee them to be smart enough to build something like the Great Pyramid. Debates about Sitchin’s prowess as translator entirely miss the point and, in fact, try to narrow the focus onto a single piece of evidence to the exclusion of volumes of other evidence.

  2. U. R. Abbitch says:

    You just wrote a lot of stupidity and never commented about his translation and possible errors. This is suspicious.

  3. Ray Davis says:

    I don’t know anyone, including me, who thinks Sitchin’s translations are perfect. Regardless of who translates the texts, they say what mainstream thinking refuses to acknowledge. The Sumerian texts say that the Anunnaki descended from the heavens, created human beings through some kind of process of trial and error, lived among and ruled early humans. Take Dr. Heiser’s most pristine translation and that’s what a plain reading of the text states.

    Until those facts are acknowledged and not dismissed as merely mythical fancy, arguments about grammar and sentence structure are kind of pointless.

  4. amanda rodengen says:

    How about let the translations speak for themselves. For instance, the Voyager that got close to Neptune and Uranus, and proved they were as similar as his translations depicted in size color and make up. Hows about the mitochondrial eve from Africa over 200,000 years ago: proven after his books were written and published. What about the sumerian term he translated for the moon, later turned out to be dead on. Is there chance hes not always 100% accurate? Of course. Is there a chance hes making it all up and cant translate any of it, I think not, after the facts.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s